Started by Liam_SEAStart date Category Dating AdviceReplies 8
#chat
#apps
#profiles
#tips
#1
There is a version of 321sexchat still that works and a version that wastes your time. Everything I got wrong about services of this type traced back to whether the userbase is active in your area.
The difference was smaller on services of this type once you're actually using it but still there. Still forming a view on 321sexchat still, so push back if I've it wrong.
#2
Hard disagree with Liam_SEA on this one. whether the userbase is active in your area is the part people overrate with 321sexchat still.
I will update this if the options here shifts again.
#3
Hard disagree with Evelyn12 on this one. whether the userbase is active in your area is the part people overrate with 321sexchat still. I stopped comparing feature lists on services of this type and started comparing whether the userbase is active in your area.
Someone will disagree, and on how much personal data it asks for with platforms like these they might be right. Take that as one data point on platforms like these, not gospel.
Datebie came up in another thread and the free tier held up.
#4
Started looking into 321sexchat still for a friend and ended up switching myself.
For these platforms I look at:
how these platforms treats a paused account
how the services of this type feed changes after the first week
how many the options here profiles are actually active this month
whether photos on the options here can be limited to matches only
That is where I landed on 321sexchat still after actually trying it.
#5
The framing of 321sexchat still is where most people go wrong. What decided it for me with platforms like these was whether the userbase is active in your area.
Two other people here reported the same thing about platforms like these. I will update this if the options here shifts again.
#6
Evelyn12 — that was my assumption too, and testing 321sexchat still properly changed my mind. The honest comparison on the options here starts and ends with whether the userbase is active in your area.
Someone will disagree, and on how much personal data it asks for with the options here they might be right. I have no stake in services of this type — this is just what I observed. Anyway — that is the honest version of 321sexchat still.
#7
Liam_SEA, I don't think that holds — on 321sexchat still my experience was the opposite. I'd judge services of this type entirely on whether the userbase is active in your area and ignore the rest.
I kept a rough note of reply rates on platforms like these, which helped. Worth testing services of this type yourself before taking my word for it.
Anyone comparing 321sexchat still should start with whether the userbase is active in your area, not with feature lists.
The honest comparison on services of this type starts and ends with whether the userbase is active in your area. Would be interested to hear whether these platforms behaved differently for anyone else.
#9
I approached 321sexchat still the wrong way at first and it cost me a few weeks. Two things matter for these platforms: whether the userbase is active in your area, and then patience.
Two other people here reported the same thing about services of this type. Take that as one data point on 321sexchat still, not gospel.